Dubnium
is a synthetic element that is not present in the environment at all. It has no
uses.
|
|
Historical
information
Dubnium
apparently was synthesized by Russian and American workers independently by
bombardment technologies. Its actual isolation as the free element has not been
accomplished. In 1967, Flerov reported element 105 after experiments at the
Joint Research Institute in Russia involving reactions between243Am ions with 22Ne ions. In 1970,
Ghiorso and others announced their synthesis of dubnium at Berkeley
(California) in the USA. This method involved the collision of249Cf ions with 15N ions.
Dubnium
was reportedly first discovered in 1968 at the Joint Institute
for Nuclear Research at Dubna (then in the Soviet Union).
Researchers there bombarded an americium-243 target
with neon-22 ions. They reported a 9.40 MeV and a 9.70 MeV
alpha-activity and assigned the decays to the isotope 260Db
or 261Db:
243
95Am + 22
10Ne → 265−x
105Db + x n
95Am + 22
10Ne → 265−x
105Db + x n
Two
years later, the Dubna team separated their reaction products by thermal
gradient chromatography after conversion to chlorides by interaction
with NbCl5. The team identified a 2.2 second spontaneous
fission activity contained within a volatile chloride portraying
eka-tantalum properties, likely dubnium-261 pentachloride, 261DbCl5.
In
the same year, a team led by Albert Ghiorso working at
the University of California, Berkeley conclusively synthesized the
element by bombarding a californium-249 target
with nitrogen-15 ions. The team published a convincing synthesis
of 260Db in the reaction
between californium-249 target and nitrogen-15 ions and
measured the alpha decay of 260Db with a half-life of 1.6 seconds and a decay energy of 9.10 MeV, correlated
with the daughter decay of lawrencium-256:
249
98Cf + 15
7N → 260
105Db + 4 n
98Cf + 15
7N → 260
105Db + 4 n
These
results by the Berkeley scientists did not confirm
the Soviet findings regarding the 9.40 MeV or 9.70 MeV alpha-decay of
dubnium-260, leaving only dubnium-261 as possible produced isotope. In 1971,
the Dubna team repeated their reaction using an improved set-up; they were able
to confirm the decay data for 260Db using the reaction:
243
95Am + 22
10Ne → 260
105Db + 5 n
95Am + 22
10Ne → 260
105Db + 5 n
In
1976, the Dubna team continued their study of the reaction using thermal
gradient chromatography. They were able to identify the products as dubnium-260
pentabromide ( 260DbBr5).
In 1992 the IUPAC/IUPAP Transfermium Working Group assessed the claims of the two groups and concluded that confidence in the discovery grew from results from both laboratories and the claim of discovery should be shared.
In 1992 the IUPAC/IUPAP Transfermium Working Group assessed the claims of the two groups and concluded that confidence in the discovery grew from results from both laboratories and the claim of discovery should be shared.
Choosing a name…say it isn’t so!
The
Soviet, later Russian, team proposed the name nielsbohrium (Ns)
in honor of the Danish nuclear physicist Niels Bohr. The American team
proposed that the new element should be named hahnium (Ha), in
honor of the late German chemist Otto Hahn. Consequently hahnium was
the name that most American and Western European scientists used and appears in
many papers published at the time, and nielsbohrium was used
in the Soviet Union and Eastern Bloccountries.
An element
naming controversy erupted between the two groups. The International
Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) thus adopted unnilpentium(Unp)
as a temporary, systematic element name. Attempting to resolve the issue,
in 1994, the IUPAC proposed the name joliotium (Jl), after the
French physicistFrédéric Joliot-Curie, which was originally proposed by Soviet
team for element 102, later named nobelium. The two principal claimants
still disagreed about the names of elements 104-106. However, in 1997 they
resolved the dispute and adopted the current name, dubnium (Db),
after the Russian town of Dubna, the location of the Joint
Institute for Nuclear Research. It was argued by IUPAC that the Berkeley
laboratory had already been recognized several times in the naming of elements (i.e., berkelium, californium, americium)
and that the acceptance of the names rutherfordium and seaborgium for
elements 104 and 106 should be offset by recognizing the Russian team's
contributions to the discovery of elements 104, 105 and 106.
Dubnium:
physical properties
- Melting point: no data K
- Boiling point: no data K
- Density of
solid: 29.3 g cm-1 or 21600
(predicted) kg m-3
Dubnium:
orbital properties
- Ground state electron
configuration: [Rn].5f14.6d3.7s2 (a
guess based upon that of tantalum)
- Shell structure:
2.8.18.32.32.11.2
- Term symbol: 4F3/2 (a
guess based upon guessed electronic structure)
Isolation
Only
very small amounts of of element 105, dubnium, have ever been made. were made
through nuclear reactions involving fusion of an isotope of californium, 249Cf, with one of nitrogen The first samples, 14N. A second route to the same isotope via berkelium is also known
15N + 249Cf → 261105Db + 4 1n
16N + 249Bk → 261105Db + 4 1n
Isolation
of an observable quantity of dubnium has never been achieved.
No comments:
Post a Comment